What type of compliance involves addressing urgent lead hazards?

Interim Control involves addressing urgent lead hazards in a way that provides a temporary solution while more permanent measures are planned or implemented. This approach is often utilized in situations where immediate risks require action, such as in residential properties with young children present, or when lead hazards are detected that pose an imminent threat to health.

Interim controls may include actions like cleaning up lead dust, covering lead paint, or repairing deteriorating paint surfaces to temporarily mitigate exposure. These measures are crucial because they help protect vulnerable populations, particularly children, from the acute health risks associated with lead poisoning.

On the other hand, Full Compliance requires more extensive action to eliminate lead hazards entirely and is not necessarily focused on urgent situations. Regulatory Compliance ensures that entities adhere to laws and regulations but does not specify the priority of urgent health risks. Standard Control may refer to routine practices but does not specifically address immediate lead hazards as Interim Control does. This makes Interim Control the most relevant answer when discussing urgent lead hazard mitigation.